Librarians made the news this week when they discovered that searches for “abortion” in the POPLINE reproductive health database no longer provided results. Turns out that Bush Administration officials complained about a couple of abortion-advocacy-related articles in the database. POPLINE is funded by USAID, the federal office which provides health care funding to foreign nations, so after the complaints POPLINE administrators decided to make the term “abortion” a stopword, effectively blocking access to any articles with that term.
According to the dean in charge of POPLINE administration, based at Johns Hopkins:
“I could not disagree more strongly with this decision, and I have directed that the Popline administrators restore ‘abortion’ as a search term immediately,” said Michael J. Klag, the school’s dean in a statement issued on Friday. “I will also launch an inquiry to determine why this change occurred. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is dedicated to the advancement and dissemination of knowledge and not its restriction.”
This is one of the more intriguing examples I’ve seen yet of electronic attempts to censor information. We in libraries search for research and scholarship via government-funded databases all the time. Never before did I suspect that search results were being suppressed or hidden. And I certainly don’t expect to personally agree with all the research I find in my searches, nor do I assume that the current presidential administration agrees with every point of view put forth in a wide body of scholarship. What do you think?